Don't really care who agrees, disagrees, gets their feathers ruffled or whatever. I'm 45 years old, fanboyism passed me by years ago. As for an ulterior motive, that's downright silly. Also, don't think I've ever seen advantage played in any of my games with the demo.Īnd yes, I do judge FIFA but default manual settings. That's the physics I'm talking about.Īs for the refs, I stand by what I said, the CPU is rarely called for fouls that are not cards. In PES, every player feels loose, they turn on a dime and shoot without effort, missed tackles mean nothing, because defenders easily sprint back without penalty. On these settings, after the "demo patch for positioning" this game is highly tactical.ġ) Refs - They call only the most egregious fouls? Huh? I have seen tons of fouls called for little pushes, or a foot stuck in slightly wrong, or a ref falling for a player faking contact drawing a foul.Īs far as physics, I'm talking about foot planting, inertia, things like that. bc if you were fair with this game, like I am, you would have done what I did which is play on -2 gamespeed, full manual passing. Why don't you do the same with FIFA? Seems you have an ulterior motive. And yet you say there are barely any physics? Btw, PES 17 on -2 gamespeed has light years more weight than Madden 17 (which still remains laughably floaty (even on the "very slow" setting) - the PS2 era of Madden had tons more feeling of being grounded).Ģ) Defending AI- It is ridiculous to judge this game on its default settings. 3) Physics - I heard Matt10 say in one of his videos that PES 17 has such amazing physics he is having a hard time putting down the game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |